Ethan A. Huff
January 8, 2013
NaturalNews) If you
have children, you are more than likely already aware of the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
"Immunization Schedules," which today recommend an astounding 29 vaccines be given between birth and six years of
age, including yearly flu shots, as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and 18 (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/). But a recent investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government
documents exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide
any real protection against disease.
Though her paper
focuses primarily on the British health system's elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination
program, the tenets of the study's findings still apply to vaccination schedules in general, which are typically designed
for the purpose of serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing
bid to satisfy the private goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent information about the dangers
and ineffectiveness of vaccines from parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And in the process,
they have put countless millions of children at risk of serious side effects and death.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage
Through several Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) requests, Dr. Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings that were held between the Joint Committee
on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), a so-called "independent expert advisory committee" that makes recommendations
to the government about vaccine policy, and various British health ministers over the years. And after poring through this
plethora of information, which had previously been veiled from public view, Dr. Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.
"[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made continuous
efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health
practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for 'herd immunity,' a concept
which ... does not rest on solid scientific evidence," explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction to her paper.
"Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH) and the
JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for
the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program."
These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr. Tomljenovic gathered speaks for itself. Not only
did the JCVI routinely ignore questions of safety as they came up with regards to the ever-expanding vaccination schedule,
but the group actively censored unfavorable data that shed a "negative" light on vaccines in order to maintain the
illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this, the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities
about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to vaccinate their kids.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early
as 1989, but covered them up
Beginning on page three
of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the JCVI clearly
engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to protect the vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from
these meetings reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe side effects associated with common vaccines like measles
and whooping cough (pertussis), both of which were clearly linked at the time to causing severe brain damage in a substantial
percentage of the children that received them.
concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on the controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years
before Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet, JCVI was already fully aware that the National Institute
for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR and vaccine-induced meningitis and encephalitis.
But rather than come forward with this information and call for further safety assessments on the vaccine, the JCVI instead
censored this critical information from the public, and blatantly lied about the safety of MMR for years.
"The extent of the JCVI's concerns with the implications of scientific assessment
of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why they were opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological disorders
following vaccination," writes Dr. Tomljenovic. "[I]nstead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until
safety concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy based on incomplete evidence that was
available at that time."
In other words, the JCVI
was more concerned with protecting the reputation of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other questionable vaccines,
than with protecting children from sustaining serious injuries as a result of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR vaccine
is concerned, this critical piece of information not only reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield's findings from 10 years
later, which were illegitimately declared to be fraudulent by the establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long
this scam has been taking place.
Vaccine companies urged
to manipulate data sheets, skew safety studies to promote vaccines
this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious amounts of information on the JCVI's longtime habit of encouraging
vaccine companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to make dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe
and effective, in accordance with their recommendations. When the JCVI's guidance contraindications for MMR, for instance,
did not match those of the vaccine's manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the manufacturer to alter its data sheets to
avoid "legal problems."
Similarly, the JCVI's
official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on independent,
scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy recommendations. Once again, the JCVI's position on the safety and effectiveness
of MMR is an excellent example of this, as the group flat out ignored legitimate MMR studies in favor of industry-backed junk
studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane Review, which technically proves nothing about the alleged safety of MMR because the
31 studies it evaluated did not even meet the group's basic methodological criteria.
"Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine as safe, based on studies
that have been proven to be either irrelevant, inconclusive, or methodologically questionable," explains Dr. Tomljenovic,
adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed epidemiological studies that only identified "association"
rather than "causation," a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the establishment typically is
of studies that contradict its own positions.
45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety
concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through
deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation
and scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.
Be sure to check
out the complete study for yourself:
Sources for this article include:
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038598_vaccines_medical_hoax_government_documents.html#ixzz2HTvAwxfq